Follow-up
It now appears that after the massive call to arms against AT&T, that they have lifted the blockade of censorship.
- At present time the story appears to be that someone was spoofing the IP of img.4chan.org and DDoSing an AT&T costumer. That customer complained and AT&T shut down access to the site. Despite the attacks not actually originating at 4chan, AT&T claims it appeared that way to them. Whether that is the truth is currently unknown. No response has been given as to why ATAT would blatantly lie to its customers through their customer service representative base or fail to contact the owner or administration.
The following is lifted directly from theOfficial AT&T Press Release:
But, alas, as the National Coalition Against Censorship points out:
The larger issue here is the possibility that a corporation can block or censor websites at will. Can AT&T do that legally? According to Central Gadget it cannot:
- At present time the story appears to be that someone was spoofing the IP of img.4chan.org and DDoSing an AT&T costumer. That customer complained and AT&T shut down access to the site. Despite the attacks not actually originating at 4chan, AT&T claims it appeared that way to them. Whether that is the truth is currently unknown. No response has been given as to why ATAT would blatantly lie to its customers through their customer service representative base or fail to contact the owner or administration.
The following is lifted directly from theOfficial AT&T Press Release:
"Beginning Friday, an AT&T customer was impacted by a denial-of-service attack stemming from IP addresses connected to img.4chan.org. To prevent this attack from disrupting service for the impacted AT&T customer, and to prevent the attack from spreading to impact our other customers, AT&T temporarily blocked access to the IP addresses in question for our customers. This action was in no way related to the content at img.4chan.org; our focus was on protecting our customers from malicious traffic.
Overnight Sunday, after we determined the denial-of-service threat no longer existed, AT&T removed the block on the IP addresses in question. We will continue to monitor for denial-of-service activity and any malicious traffic to protect our customers."
But, alas, as the National Coalition Against Censorship points out:
"DDOS attacks are a frequent occurrence, however, and AT&T has not previously blocked access to sites in response. Besides, such an attack occupies a tiny fraction of the total bandwidth through the AT&T network and is unlikely to affect it very much. As a result, an inevitable suspicion arises that it was img.4chan.org’s content that made the corporation act in this case."
The larger issue here is the possibility that a corporation can block or censor websites at will. Can AT&T do that legally? According to Central Gadget it cannot:
"Under the FCC’s Comcast/BitTorrent ruling, Internet Service Providers may only slow or cap connection speeds. They are not allowed to block any service or protocol on the internet. Here, 4chan as a web site appears to fall under an internet service, but it is also conforming to standard web page protocols. It appears AT&T does not have the legal right to block 4chan, only to cap customers who are “abusing” their access to the internet."
|
|



